Pentaquarks in SU(3) quark model

February 2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

in
o

^ ; PENTAQUARKS IN SU(3) QUARK MODEL

oo

HUNGCHONG KIM

Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology
Pohang 790-784, Korea
' E-mail: hungchon@postech.ac.kr

>

in

YONGSEOK OH

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Georgia
I Athens, Georgia 30602, USA

■ E-mail: yoh@physast.uga.edu

o

^ , Based on the flavor SU(3) symmetry, we classify all the possible pentaquark

baryons made of four quarks and one antiquark. In particular, we present possible
multiplets of pentaquarks, their interactions with mesons, and the mass relations
^ l' within a multiplet. We also study the pentaquark decays in the generalized OZI

D , rule.

1. Introduction

X

H I After the first report on the pentaquark 8^(1540) ^ and its subsequent

confirmation ^, there has been a huge amount of works studying pen-
taquark properties theoretically and experimentally. Experimentally the
subsequent observation of S~~(1862) by NA49 Collaboration ^ may sug-
gest that 2(1862) forms pentaquark antidecuplet with 6+ (1540) as antici-
pated by the soliton model ^. Later the HI Collaboration reported on the
existence of anti-charmed pentaquark state ^, which revives the interests in
the heavy pentaquark system However, the existence of pentaquark

baryons is not fully confirmed yet as some experiments report null results for
those states A summary for the experimental situation and perspec-
tives can be found, e.g., in Refs. 11. Theoretically, many ideas have been
put forward to study the exotic pentaquark states in various approaches
and models 12,13,14^ more detailed studies are required to understand
the properties and formation of pentaquark states.

As the pentaquark baryons may be produced in photon-hadron or
hadron-hadron reactions, it is important to understand their production

1

February 2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

2

mechanisms and decay channels in order to confirm the existence of the
pentaquark states and to study their properties. The present studies on
the production reactions, however, are limited by the lack of experimental
and phenomenological inputs on some couplings I5,i6,i7,i8,i9 particu-
lar, those studies do not include the contributions from the intermediate
pentaquark states in production mechanisms. Therefore it is desirable to
classify the pentaquarks based on the flavor SU(3) symmetry albeit the
experimental uncertainties for their existence. The general classification is
useful not only for identifying possible pentaquarks but also for providing
selection rules for their decays and the mass relations.

Of course, one can expect certain mixing among the possible multiplets.
Indeed, many theoretical speculations suggest that the physical pentaquark
states would be mixtures of various multiplets 20,21,22^ Thus it is necessary
to construct the wavefunctions of pentaquark baryons in terms of quark
and antiquark for understanding the structure of pcntaqiiark states. In
this talk, we classify all the pentaquarks in SU(3) quark model and obtain
their SU(3) symmetric interactions with other baryons. Then mass relations
among the pentaquark baryons will be presented. In addition, we explore
the special case when the antidecuplet-octct ideal mixing is imposed to the
pentaquark baryons. The topics presented in this manuscript are discussed
in more detail in Refs. 23, 24, 25.

2. General classification of pentaquarks

The SU(3) flavor symmetry is a nice platform to construct possible pen-
taquark multiplets. Having four-quark and one antiquark, the possible
multiplets for the pentaquarks are

303030303 = 35 e (3)27 8 (2)l0 (4)10 (8)8 ® (3)1. (1)

Thus, we expect 91 different ground-state pentaquarks in total. Of course,
possible multiplets can be reduced under model assumptions. We name
all the pentaquarks based on hypercharge and isospin. We denote the
first subscript as the multiplet that the resonance sits in and the second
subscript as the isospin. For S-like resonance, for example, we have S27,2
belonging to the 27-plet with isospin 2. The superscript will be reserved
for the charge. Obvious indices will be suppressed for simplicity.

It is straightforward to construct the highest multiplet from Eq.(l).
The weight diagram for the 35-plet and our assignment for the resonances
are shown in Fig. 1. The resonance X, which has hypercharge —3 and
isospin 1/2, is interesting for future search. By eliminating the states at

2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

Y I

2 0^

5/2,3/2 A,,,., A„

2, 1 ^35,2 5 ^5

3/2,1/2 ■^35^/2 i '^S
1,0 ^5,1 , ^5

1/2 X

Figure 1. The weight diagram for tlie 35-plet. Our assignment for tlie resonances
axe presented according to the specified hypercharge and isospin. In this diagram, the
resonance X is special by its hypercharge and isospin.

the corners in Fig. 1, one can generate the weight diagram for the 27-plet.

Further successive chmination generates dccuplet, antidecuplet, octet and
singlet. All the resonances other than the 35-plet are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Pentaquark baryons except the 35-plet. For the 35-plet, see Fig. 1.

multiplet

hypercharge isospin

particle

1

a¥

8

1 1/2
1

-1 1/2

, Sg, Eg

"8' "8

10

1 3/2
1
-1 1/2
-2

A++ A+ AO A~
v~

'^lO' ^10' ^10
"10' "10
^10

10

2
1 1/2
1

-1 3/2

+

10' 10

S^, SlL, T,—

^0' 10' ^^10
"To,3/2' "10,3/2' "10,3/2' "l0,3/2

27

2 1
1 3/2
1 1/2
2
1

-1 3/2
-1 1/2
-2 1

'^27*'' ^27' ^27' ^^27

N+,

V + + vO V —
^^27, 2' ^27,2' '^27,2' ^^27, 2' ^^27, 2

v+ vo v~

^27' ^^27' ^^27
AO

+
"27,3/2' "27,3/2' "27,3/2' "27,3/2

"27' "27

5*27,1, "27,1' "27,1

February 2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

4

3. Tensor notation and SU(3) Lagrangians

To get the SU(3) symmetric Lagrangian, it is useful to represent all the
resonances in the tensor notation. In the tensor notation, the (p, q) type of
Young tableaux is represented by the tensor, Taltl^.'.'.fap, which is completely
symmetric in upper and lower indices. Also it is traceless on every pair
of upper and lower indices. In the tensor notation, all the pentaquark
multiplets can be represented by

1:S, 8 : P; , 10 : D^fe ,

TO:T*^\ 27:T^f", 35 : T^t,^ . (2)

Since we know how the quarks (and antiquarks) transform in SU(3), one
can easily construct transformation rules for the upper and lower indices
separately. Then one can assign each resonance with a specific tensor or
linear combination of tensors within a multiplet '^^ . The SU(3) symmetric
lagrangians can be constructed by collecting all the possible contractions of
upper and lower indices. This is only way to form a SU(3) invariant under
SU(3) transformation. These interactions give selection rules that can be
used to search for specific pentaquarks.

For the interactions between pentaquark-baryon-octet-meson-octet, we
obtain

l5-83:9i.83 54M^ + (H.c.)

85 - 83 : (rf + f)P!BiMt + {d- f)PlBfMi + (H.c.)
IO5 - 83 : 510-83 ^vkD^'^^BiM^ + (H.c.)
IO5 - 83 : 5T0-83 ^''""T.^^BiMi + (H.c.)

275 - 83 : 527-83 TiiBlMi + (H.c.) . (3)

Here we note that the 35-plet can not couple to the baryon octet and meson
octet. For 85 — 83 case, there are two possible ways to form fully contracted
terms, which lead to the famous /- and d-type interactions. It is somewhat
painful to write down all the interactions in terms of the resonances that
we have identified above but it can be done "^^ .

As a second set, we have pentaquark interactions with baryon decuplet

February 2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

5

and meson octet. They are

85 - IO3 : 58-103 e'^'p\Df^M^ + (H.c.)
IO5 - IO3 : 510-103 D^'^DtlMJ^ + (H.C.)
275 - IO3 : 527-103 ^'"^'^Tf^DtliMi + (H.c.)
355 - IO3 : .g35_i03 Tf'D,,kM^ + (H.c.) . (4)

The interactions of pentaquark-pentaquark-meson-octet can be con-
structed similarly and they can be found in Ref. 25.

One remark is that the pentaquarks in the 35-plet can be measured in
decuplet-octet decay. If X in the 35-plet exists, it can be measured in the
unique decay mode

X-{X—)-^K"n~{K'^l~). (5)
This decay mode is not affected by the mixing among the multiplets.

4. Mass relations

To derive mass relations among pentaquarks, we note first that QCD mass
terms can be written by

/m„

MQCD = {uds) m,, ) ( ri ) aq^qi + bq'Yf qj

V m,

1 /'^O

where y = - Q 1 I . (6)

3

,0 0-2,

This gives a simple recipe to construct mass terms to leading order in SU(3)

breaking: the mass term can be constructed by making fully contracted
terms inchiding hypercharge matrix Y. Within this prescription, we obtain
the following mass formulas for each multiplet,

85 : aP;P/ 4- bP]Y^P^ + cP]Yi> PI

IO5 : aD^'^'D^.k + bD''''Yl,D,,i
TO5 : aT,jkT'^'' + bT,jkYi''T'^'

27 : aJ^,T^ + bTlY^^T^r + ^l^T^

. ai I J-jklm ^-^ i -^nklm i ^n^jklm • \* )

February 2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

6

Note, the parameters a, b, c in different multiplets should be different. Here,
for the octet, we obtain the pentaquark analog of Gell-Mann-Okubo mass
formula

2{Ns + Ss) = 3A8 + Sg , (8)
equal-spacing rule for the decuplct and antidccuplct
f^io — ^10 = ^10 ~ — Sio — Aio

2x0,3/2 -Sio = -A^To - A^To -0 • (9)
We find additional mass relations for the 27-plct

3(S27 + Oi) = 2(A27 + 2N27), 3(S27,3/2 + SOi) = 4A27 + 5N27,
3(S27 + 261) = A27 + 8iV27, 3(^*27,1 + Sei) = 2(A27 + 57V27) , (10)

from which we derive the GMO type relation

2(7V27 + S27) =3A27 + S27 , (H)

and two relations of equal-spacing-rule type

^27,1 — ■^27,3/2 = ■^27,3/2 ~ '^27,2,

S27,2-A27 = A27-ei. (12)

For the 35-plet, we similarly obtain the foUowings

^^35 — = S35 — S35 = S35 — A35 = A35 — 02,

X — ^35,1 — ^35,1 — ^35,3/2 = S35,3/2 — ^35^2 = 5^35,2 — A5/2 ,

5(e2 + S35,2) = 2(2A5/2 + 3A35),

5(S35 - £35,2) = -4(A5/2 - A35) ,

5(S35 - 2X35,2) = -8A5/2 + 3A35 ,

5(035 - 3S35,2) = -2(6A5/2 - A35) . (13)

5. Decay modes in the generalized OZI rule

In the diquark-diquark-antiquark model of pcntaqiiarks, Jaffc and Wilczek
advocated the ideal mixing of the antidecuplet with the octet In this
picture, the two diquarks form 6/. By combining with the antiquark of
3/, one can form pentaquarks belonging to the antidecuplet and octet,
6 (g) 3 = 10 © 8. This multiplication in the tensor notation can be written
as

S''J®g'= = T*^fc©S'[*^''=l. (14)

February 2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

7

Obviously, the last part, being an octet representation, can be replaced by
a two-index field P/ as

g[i3M ^ ^Ijkpz ^ ^likpj _ (;^5)

The separation into the two terms in the right-hand side is necessary to
make it symmetric in i and j. If one assumes that the pentaquark decay
goes through the fall-apart mechanism, the index k in Eq. (15), the index for
the antiquark, should be contracted with the antiquark index of the meson
field. This is in fact equivalent to the generalized OZI rule where the quark-
connected diagram dominates over the quark- annihilated diagram "^^ in the
pentaquark decay. In this approach, the interaction take the form

Cs = g^^'^S[,,.k}BlMl + (H.c). (16)

Substituting Eq. (15) into Eq. (16), one has

A = 2g^-p^BiMl + gsPTMiBl, + (H.c.) . (17)

Comparison with the standard expression for the octet baryon interactions
leads to / = 1/2 and d = 3/2. Therefore, the OZI rule makes a special
choice on the f/d ratio as f/d = 1/3

In Table 2, we present the decay modes of pentaquarks in the ideal mix-
ing. The ss component has been separated in the quark wavcfunctions for
pentaquark baryons, normal baryons and normal mesons. The pentaquarks
that do not suffer from the ideal mixing will have the same decay modes as
presented in the earlier sections.

6. Summary

We have classified all the pentaquark baryons in the flavor SU(3). The
tenor method has been facilitated in constructing their interactions with
normal baryons and mesons. We have also presented the mass relations
for the pentaquarks which take into account the SU(3) breaking to leading
order. This will help to identify not only exotic baryons but also crypto-
exotic states. Finally we have discussed the decay modes in the generalized
OZI rule, which turns out be equivalent to the ideal mixing or fall-apart
mechanism.

References

1. LEPS Collaboration, T. Nakano et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 012002 (2003).

February 2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

8

2. DIANA Collaboration, V. V. Barmin et ai, Phys. At. Nucl. 66, 1715 (2003);
CLAS Collaboration, S. Stepanyan et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 252001 (2003);
SAPHIR Collaboration, J. Barth et al., Phys. Lett. B 572, 127 (2003); CLAS
Collaboration, V. Kubarovsky et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 032001 (2004);
A. E. Asratyan, A. G. Dolgolenko, and M. A. Kubantsev, Phys. At. Nucl.
67, 682 (2004); HERMES Collaboration, A. Airapctian et al., Phys. Lett.
B 585, 213 (2004); SVD Collaboration, A. Aleev et al, hep-ex/0401024;
COSY-TOF Collaboration, M. Abdel-Bary et al., Phys. Lett. B 595, 127
(2004); P. Zh. Aslanyan, V. N. Emclyanonko, and G. G. Rikhkvitzkaya, hop-
ex/0403044; ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al, Phys. Lett. B 591, 7
(2004); Yu. A. Troyan et al., hep-ex/0404003; S. V. Chekanov for the ZEUS
Collaboration, hep-ex/0404007.

3. NA49 Collaboration, C. Alt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 042003 (2004).

4. D. Diakonov, V. Potrov, and M. Polyakov, Z. Phys. A 359, 305 (1997).

5. HI Collaboration, A. Aktas et al, hcp-cx/0403017.

6. H. ,J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett. B 195, 484 (1987); C. Gignoux, B. Silvestre-Brac,
and J. M. Richard, Phys. Lett. B 193, 323 (1987).

7. Y. Oh, B.-Y. Park, and D.-P. Min, Phys. Lett. B 331, 362 (1994); Phys. Rev.
D 50, 3350 (1994); Y. Oh and B.-Y. Park, Phys. Rev. D 51, 5016 (1995);
M. Genovese, J.-M. Richard, Fl. Stancu, and S. Pepin, Phys. Lett. B 425,
171 (1998); Fl. Stancu, Phys. Rev. D 58, 111501 (1998).

8. H. Kim, S. H. Lee, and Y. Oh, Phys. Lett. B 595, 293 (2004).

9. BES Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al., Phys. Rev. D 70, 012004 (2004); K. T.
Knopflc et al. for the HERA-B Collaboration, J. Phys. G 30, S1363 (2004);
HERA-B Collaboration, I. Abt et al., hep-ex/0408048; C. Pinkenburg, nucl-
ex/0404001; SPHINX Collaboration, Yu. M. Antipov et al., hep-ex/0407026;
BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert et al, hep-ex/0408037; hep-ex/0408064.

10. H. G. Fischer and S. Wenig, hep-ex/0401014; STAR Collaboration, S. Ka-
bana et al., hep-ex/0406032; J. Pochodzalla, hcp-cx/0406077; WA89 Col-
laboration, M. I. Adamovich et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 022201 (2004); I. V.
Gorelov for the CDF Collaboration, hep-ex/0408025.

11. V. D. Burkcrt et al., nucl-ex/0408019; V. Kubarovsky and P. Stoler, hep-
ex/0409025; K. Hicks, hcp-ph/0408001.

12. B. K. Jennings and K. Maltman, Phys. Rev. D 69, 094020 (2004).

13. R. L. Jaffe, hep-ph/0409065.

14. S. H. Lee, H. Kim and Y. Kwon, Phys. Lett. B 609, 252 (2005)

15. W. Liu and C. M. Ko, Phys. Rev. C 68, 045203 (2003); Nucl. Phys. A 741,
215 (2004); W. Liu et al, Phys. Rev. C 69, 025202 (2004).

16. Y. Oh, H. Kirn, and S. H. Lcc, Phys. Rev. D 69, 014009 (2004); Phys. Rev.
D 69, 074016 (2004); Y. Oh, H. Kim and S. H. Lee, Nucl. Phys. A 745, 129
(2004).

17. A. R. Dzicrba et al., Phys. Rev. D 69, 051901 (2004); W. Roberts, nucl-
th/0408034.

18. Q. Zhao and J. S. Al-Khalih, Phys. Lett. B 585, 91 (2004); 596, 317(E)
(2004); B.-G. Yu, T.-K. Choi, and C.-R. Ji, nucl-th/03 12075.

19. K. Nakayama and K. Tsushima, Phys. Lett. B 583, 269 (2004); K. Nakayama

2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

9

and W. G. Love, Phys. Rev. C 70, 012201 (2004); Y. Oh, K. Nakayama and
T. S. Lee, hep-ph/0412363.

20. R. Jaffa and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232003 (2003).

21. F. E. Close and J. J. Dudek, Phys. Lett. B 586, 75 (2004).

22. J. EUis, M. Karliner, and M. Praszalowicz, JHEP 05, 002 (2004).

23. Y. Oh, H. Kim, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 69, 094009 (2004).

24. S. H. Lee, H. Kim and Y. Oh, J. Korean Phys. See. 46, 774 (2005).

25. Y. Oh and H. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 70, 094022 (2004).

26. S. Pakvasa and M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. D 70, 036002 (2004).

27. S. M. Golbeck and M. A. Savrov, hep-ph/0406060.

February 2, 2008 3:29 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

pyungchang

10

Tabic 2. Couplings of the ideally mixed pentaquark baryon states. The
subscripts represent states with either purely light quark-antiquark pairs or
purely strange quark-antiquark pairs.

NT

-^/6

K+A

-^/3

VqqP

VssP

3

-V3

^/3

7T~p

V3

Vqq

3

%/2

-73

tt+EO
7rOS+

TT+A

K"p

3
2

K+S°

V6

4

— V '■'>

-V6

-Ve

^qq ^ss

^-p -\/f

i^oso -V3
77,, SO -^/6